Who owns OpenAI?
From Idealism to Pragmatism
OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, has a complex ownership structure and is currently embroiled in disputes with its biggest investor, Microsoft. How did we get here and what are the implications for the industry's future?
The Early Days of OpenAI: A Non-Profit Focused on Safe AI
OpenAI was founded in December 2015 as a non-profit research institute dedicated to developing safe and beneficial artificial general intelligence (AGI) for humanity. Its founders included prominent figures in the tech industry such as Elon Musk, Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, and Ilya Sutskever. The initial goal was to ensure that the immense potential of AI didn't become concentrated in the hands of a few powerful companies and that it would be used to benefit all of humanity. Looking back at it today, many critics question how far the company, and an increasingly concentrated industry, have come from this original objective.
The Shift to a Capped-Profit Model and Microsoft's Entry
By 2019, OpenAI realized that it needed substantial capital to finance the computing power required to develop advanced AI technologies. As a result, the company transitioned from a pure non-profit to a "capped-profit" for-profit entity. This change allowed OpenAI to attract more investment while upholding its original mission. Microsoft became OpenAI's largest investor in 2019, providing an initial $1 billion investment and gaining certain rights to license and utilize OpenAI's technology. This partnership gave OpenAI access to Microsoft's vast cloud computing resources, which are crucial for training large AI models.
OpenAI's Current Ownership Structure
Currently, OpenAI Inc., the non-profit parent company, oversees the overall direction of the company. OpenAI LP is the for-profit subsidiary responsible for commercial operations. Microsoft owns a 49% stake in OpenAI LP, while other investors, including venture capital firms and individuals, own the remaining 49%. The original OpenAI non-profit foundation retains autonomy within the structure. This hybrid model aims to balance OpenAI's mission-driven research with the need for significant financial resources. However, it has also led to internal conflict and tensions with Microsoft, particularly regarding the control and direction of OpenAI's technology.
Disputes with Microsoft: Control, Direction, and Costs
The relationship between OpenAI and Microsoft has become increasingly strained. There are several key points of contention:
Control: OpenAI's board has expressed concerns about becoming overly reliant on Microsoft. Microsoft's significant stake in OpenAI and its exclusive cloud provider status raise questions about the non-profit board's ability to maintain independence.
Direction: OpenAI executives have expressed frustration with the pace at which Microsoft is providing computing resources. They believe that Microsoft's reluctance to invest further is hindering their progress toward developing AGI.
Costs: The cost of developing and operating AI models is astronomical. OpenAI is expected to spend billions of dollars on computing power in the coming years. These financial pressures have led to OpenAI seeking alternative sources of computing power and investment, such as a $10 billion deal with Oracle.
Transition to a Public Benefit Corporation and Elon Musk's Lawsuit
OpenAI is currently in the process of transitioning from its current hybrid structure to a public benefit corporation. This change would further solidify its for-profit status while requiring it to balance profit generation with a commitment to social good. Adding another layer to the complexity, Elon Musk, one of OpenAI's co-founders, sued the company in February 2024. Musk's lawsuit alleges that OpenAI has abandoned its original mission of developing AI for the benefit of humanity and has become too focused on profit maximization, particularly for Microsoft. Musk is seeking a court ruling to force OpenAI to make its research public and to prevent it from using ChatGPT and other technologies for profit.
Valuation, Ownership and Antitrust
OpenAI and Microsoft are currently negotiating to determine how Microsoft's nearly $14 billion investment in OpenAI as a nonprofit will translate into equity in the for-profit company OpenAI is transitioning into. OpenAI has hired Goldman Sachs, and Microsoft has hired Morgan Stanley, to help advise on this complex process as OpenAI becomes the second-most-valuable startup in the U.S. behind SpaceX. This process is further complicated by needing to determine governance rights for investors and equity for employees, including CEO Sam Altman. OpenAI has two years to become a for-profit or investors can ask to be paid back. The situation is drawing scrutiny from antitrust regulators concerned about the power of giant tech companies.
From Idealism to Pragmatism
OpenAI's journey from a non-profit focused on safely developing AI for humanity's benefit to a for-profit entity negotiating equity stakes with powerful investors like Microsoft demonstrates a significant shift in its operational philosophy. The current disputes about control and ownership, particularly with Microsoft vying for a potentially controlling stake, underscore how the profit motive is now a central driver in OpenAI's evolution. The original mission of benefiting humanity, while still mentioned, appears to have taken a backseat to the financial interests of investors and key employees. The complex negotiations over equity distribution, governance rights, and potential regulatory scrutiny all point to a future where OpenAI's trajectory will be heavily influenced by market forces and the pursuit of financial success.
OpenAI faces significant challenges as it navigates between its founding mission and the demands of an increasingly competitive AI market. While uncertainty surrounds OpenAI's future and its potential impact on AGI development, the company's trajectory remains promising.